Sep 10, 2016 the,. To of and a in ' 's that for on is The was with said as at it by from be have he has his are an ) not ( will who I had their - were they but been this which more or its would about: after up $ one than also 't out her you year when It two people - all can over last first But into ' He A we In she other new years could there? Time some them if no percent so what only government. Learn how to do just about everything at eHow. Find expert advice along with How To videos and articles, including instructions on how to make, cook, grow, or do almost anything. See posts, photos and more on Facebook. Shop by department, purchase cars, fashion apparel, collectibles, sporting goods, cameras, baby items, and everything else on eBay, the world's online marketplace. Maclaren mac 3 jogging stroller manual.

I understand there are many types of totems as well as the totem support gems. I've seen many people upgrading Spell/Elemental Damage passives to increase the effect of spells used along side the Spell Totem support gem, which makes a lot sense. Seeing this I have two questions: 1) Do Spell/Elemental Damage passives work for Flame, Shockwave and Searing Bond Totems like they do for Spell Totems? 2) Am I likely to get more DPS using Spell Totem or using the regular totem skills?	Posted by B3ndetta on Jan 19, 2014, 3:40:24 PM
1) That doesn't depend on whether it's totem or not, it depends only on its effect having 'spell' damage type or not. All effects that do not involve weapon damage are technically spells, some also do 'spell' damage and some do not. There are four base damage types in the game, any damage you did can be only one of those. attack spell secondary damage over time Flame totem does spell damage. Shockwave totem does not, it's secondary damage, just like bear trap and detonate dead. Searing bond is damage over time. 2) Depends on the spell, some perform better, some perform worse. Shockwave totem doesn't have high damage and it's hard to scale it so most spell totems will do more, its value is in utility. Incinerate spell totem is stronger than flame totem and costs less mana. On the other hand firestorm totem is most likely worse for single targets and small groups than flame totem but has more area. Native totems are not too versatile, either, they're only fire damage as it's associated with STR stat. Есть один путь - наверх! ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]► ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►	Posted by raics on Jan 19, 2014, 4:54:08 PM
Thank you very much for your reply, I searched ages for these sort of answers before. I've also done some tests myself and seen how the regular totems are affected by spell/elemental damage buffs. I think I am likely to use the regular native totems in my build as it will save gem sockets and all :D	Posted by B3ndetta on Jan 19, 2014, 5:39:10 PM
Bump! @raics Thank you for your detailed answer. Was wondering why all my +spell dmg gear and gems weren't doing anything to Searing Bond. Thanks again	Posted by BrewWarrior on May 12, 2014, 6:25:53 AM
' Bump! @raics Thank you for your detailed answer. Was wondering why all my +spell dmg gear and gems weren't doing anything to Searing Bond. Thanks again Since raics post spell totem has been nerfed a bit in patch 1.1.0: With those changes i would say that spell totem - incinerate is no longer stronger than flame totem as the former now has a multiplicative cast speed penalty which is especially bad for incinerate as its damage scales over time. Chars with easy access to eldritch battery or blood magic to compensate the high mana cost of flame totem are better off using that instead of incinerate.	Posted by Bada_Bing on May 12, 2014, 10:03:20 AM
' Since raics post spell totem has been nerfed a bit in patch 1.1.0: With those changes i would say that spell totem - incinerate is no longer stronger than flame totem as the former now has a multiplicative cast speed penalty which is especially bad for incinerate as its damage scales over time. Right, flame totem is stronger now, with the last nerf to spell totem support gem, incinerate not only does less DPS than before but also gains stacks slower. Есть один путь - наверх! ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/balancedux]► ◄[www.moddb.com/mods/one-vision1]►	Posted by raics on May 12, 2014, 10:13:33 AM

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Work
How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Can You
How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg File

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Work

How much damage does consecration get from spell dmg mean

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Can You

Let's say you have a wand with innate 10% spell damage, a mod on it that has an additional 30% spell damage, a shield with 15% spell damage, 50% spell damage from skills and 25% increased fire damage. Spells that deal fire damage will now do (1 + 0.1 + 0.3 + 0.15 + 0.5 + 0.25)x damage. Aka: 230% damage. Also, even if you're going for say an ice witch build, it's better to get 10% spell dmg node than a 8% ice dmg node, obviously. Also, some mobs are resistant to specific elements, so flat spell dmg is better than a specific element boost because it will then apply to other elements too. I like this idea, but it would make Consecration a completely different ability. Like a holy radiance that does damage. Overpowered for pvp. Paladin smokebomb. Overpowered for pvp. Paladin desecration. Would never affect haste. Maybe movement speed. Increase dmg, reduce mana cost IMO.

I’m going to use Wizard spells for this, and calculate the average of the direct damages, so using wish to summon a boulder over an enemies head doesn’t count.

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Work

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg Can You

How Much Damage Does Consecration Get From Spell Dmg File

Report Forum Post